Judge Recognizes That Parents Aren't Liable For Kids RIAA Mis-Adventures
Via Techdirt.com
(http://techdirt.com/articles/20050921/0959248_F.shtml)
"...a judge has said that the liability cannot be placed on the parent, freaking out the RIAA, who withdrew the case, and then tried to have the judge open up another way to go after the kid -- and the judge refused."
Sweet, sweet victory!
Note:
The above comments are not mine. While, I'm no big fan of the RIAA. I'm not a big fan of illegal file sharing either. However, that's not what I find most shocking of this case.
Basically, what this judge just did in Michigan is say that this parent of a 13 year old child is not held responsible for their child's actions. That is such a complete load of bullshit. How will this child ever learn responsibility if not from the parent? It shouldn't take the world to raise YOUR child. You should be the one instilling virtues of what is right and wrong in your child's life.
Stuff like this just pisses me off.
read more | digg story
(http://techdirt.com/articles/20050921/0959248_F.shtml)
"...a judge has said that the liability cannot be placed on the parent, freaking out the RIAA, who withdrew the case, and then tried to have the judge open up another way to go after the kid -- and the judge refused."
Sweet, sweet victory!
Note:
The above comments are not mine. While, I'm no big fan of the RIAA. I'm not a big fan of illegal file sharing either. However, that's not what I find most shocking of this case.
Basically, what this judge just did in Michigan is say that this parent of a 13 year old child is not held responsible for their child's actions. That is such a complete load of bullshit. How will this child ever learn responsibility if not from the parent? It shouldn't take the world to raise YOUR child. You should be the one instilling virtues of what is right and wrong in your child's life.
Stuff like this just pisses me off.
read more | digg story
posted by unknown at 12:15 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home